Micro-eliminating HCV in 8 diverse prisons that serve a general population of 3.7 million in the Yorkshire region of England

Background: National Health Service England (NHSE) plans to eliminate Hepatitis C (HCV) by 2025. With a reported HCV prevalence of about 6% in male prisons, and about 12% in female prisons, secure environments are an essential component of this elimination plan. Yorkshire is a region in England with a general population of about 3.7 M. PPG is the provider of healthcare to 9 prisons in Yorkshire, with approximately 6,000 residents, many of whom are current, or previous, substance users. Description of model of care/intervention: To support NHSE in the elimination of HCV, a partnership between Gilead Sciences, Practice Plus Group (PPG) and the Hepatitis C Trust (HCT) was formed in 2019. This partnership works with prison and hospital teams to optimise test and treat pathways for new prison admissions. In addition, whole prison HCV Intensive Test and Treat events (HITT programmes) were run in targeted prisons to ensure testing of residents who were incarcerated before these optimisations were implemented. Effectiveness: HCV screening, within 7 days of prison entry, increased from 27% in May 2019 to 93% in January 2022. This increase was achieved despite COVID-19 restrictions remaining in place since March 2020 across all English prisons. In addition, HITT programmes were used to test residents who were missed at prison entry. The overall result is that 8/9 prisons have achieved microelimination status, as defined by: >= 95% of prison residents tested within the previous 12 months, >= 90% of RNA positive patients treated or initiated on treatment and presence of a robust system to review ongoing testing and treatment performance to ensure these targets are maintained. Conclusion and next steps: Micro-elimination of HCV will now need to be maintained in these prisons by ensuring the uptake of HCV testing remains>95%. Plans are in place to micro-eliminate the final prison-which is a high-security prison presenting unique challenges to HCV micro-elimination.

Micro-eliminating hepatitis C in a network of 47 English Prisons through an industry, prison healthcare and patient organisation partnership

Background and aims: National Health Service England (NHSE) plans to eliminate Hepatitis C (HCV) in England by 2025, five years earlier than World Health Organisation goals. With a reported HCV prevalence of ∼6% in male prisons, and ∼12% in female prisons, secure environments are an essential component of this elimination plan. In 2020, NHSE defined HCV micro-elimination as ³95% of prison residents tested within the previous 12 months, ³90% of RNA positive patients treated or initiated on treatment and presence of a robust system to review ongoing testing and treatment performance to ensure these targets are maintained. Method: To support NHSE in their HCV Elimination Program, a partnership between Gilead Sciences, Practice Plus Group (PPG) and the Hepatitis C Trust (HCT)was formed in 2019. PPG is the provider of healthcare to 47 English prisons with approximately 30, 000 residents. PPG Regional BBV Lead Nurses, and Gilead Medical Scientists worked with prison and HCV stakeholders to optimise test and treat pathways for new prison admissions. Whole prison HCV Intensive Test and Treat events (HITTs) were also run in targeted prisons to ensure testing of residents who were incarcerated before these optimisations were implemented. Results: Following pathway optimisation across the PPG network of 47 prisons, the HCV screening within 7 days of prison entry increased from 41% in May 2019 to 84% in October 2021. This increase was achieved despite there being significant restrictions to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 being in place across all English prisons. HITTs have been performed in 15 PPG prisons to-date. 1, 909 new RNA+ diagnoses were made during this time with 1, 848 patients started on direct-acting antiviral treatments. By November 2021, 16 out of the 47 prisons have been given micro-elimination status by NHSE with 4 more having submitted data demonstrating achievement of this target and awaiting decision. A further 4 more prisons are on track to achieve micro-elimination by April 2022. Conclusion: This partnership has demonstrated that, even during a global pandemic, it is possible to achieve the micro-elimination of HCV in a defined setting. Maintenance of micro-elimination status is essential if we are to achieve the WHO HCV targets, requiring robust pathways that are regularly adapted to the changing environment, and systems for tracking performance, both of which have been put in place by this partnership.

Governing education in times of crisis: State interventions and school accountabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic

Strategic government interventions in public education have shifted and blurred the boundaries between state, market and civil society modes of governance. Within this matrix of interdependent relations, schools operate under increasingly hybrid accountability arrangements in which public accountability can both complement and compete with market and social regimes and their associated institutional logics, goals, values and mechanisms. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, national governments implemented a wide range of emergency measures which had consequences for the mixes and layers of school accountabilities. This article examines the principal policy changes in Denmark, England and Italy. Drawing on state theories and the concept of ‘hybrid accountability’, semi-structured interviews with national and local policymakers and school practitioners were analysed thematically. While cultural nuances exist between the cases, our findings reveal that state interventions reinforce a public–professional accountability hybrid and hierarchies of control and command within and outside networks. Concomitantly, state non-interventions and the distinct underlying institutional logics associated with national large-scale assessments suggest policy inertia with implications for professional accountability and institutionalised change. Future research might investigate whether educators’ experiences influence the direction of national and local accountability policy reforms in a post-pandemic era. © The Author(s) 2021.

How do employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young workers? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To assess the quality of the research about how employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young workers, and to summarize the available evidence. METHODS: We undertook a systematic search of three databases using a tiered search strategy. Studies were included if they: (a) assessed employment conditions such as working hours, precarious employment, contract type, insecurity, and flexible work, or psychosocial workplace exposures such as violence, harassment and bullying, social support, job demand and control, effort-reward imbalance, and organizational justice; (b) included a validated mental health measure; and (c) presented results specific to young people aged ≤ 30 years or were stratified by age group to provide an estimate for young people aged ≤ 30 years. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the review. Four were related to employment conditions, capturing contract type and working hours. Five studies captured concepts relevant to psychosocial workplace exposures including workplace sexual harassment, psychosocial job quality, work stressors, and job control. The quality of the included studies was generally low, with six of the nine at serious risk of bias. Three studies at moderate risk of bias were included in the qualitative synthesis, and results of these showed contemporaneous exposure to sexual harassment and poor psychosocial job quality was associated with poorer mental health outcomes among young workers. Longitudinal evidence showed that exposure to low job control was associated with incident depression diagnosis among young workers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review illustrate that even better studies are at moderate risk of bias. Addressing issues related to confounding, selection of participants, measurement of exposures and outcomes, and missing data will improve the quality of future research in this area and lead to a clearer understanding of how employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young people. Generating high-quality evidence is particularly critical given the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on young people's employment. In preparing for a post-pandemic world where poor-quality employment conditions and exposure to psychosocial workplace exposures may become more prevalent, rigorous research must exist to inform policy to protect the mental health of young workers.